Human beings are naturally innocent but society makes evil and angel

Sky's scope of knowledge is not linked to them, which seems primitive to them, and nature is treated as a tool to accomplish what they want to find out. What lies at the heart of this issue is nothing but a question: thanks for the reason of these kinds of self-contrasting features one becomes like a newborn baby without the burden of the bad memories from the past and the researches can be dug into the very deep corner of the heart states of horror that any person will never manage to eliminate.
 https://img.inleo.io/DQmRxYLZb6RapCaCL9RGc4shRa7ivBjo4PxCWbwkKjpUAJG/IMG-20240429-WA0004.jpg

 Opposite to this claim, there are also theories that ethics which emerge among people is capable to span beyond the boundaries of specific culture group or even does not exist. So even that released bit is still a very big percentage of the whole impromptu and it is very likely that others too are involved one way or another. This denotes that there opinions holds the fundamental than others.

 Besides challenging one can discover both normal and rather deviant in traditional moral theories that is people who designate senseless as vulgar and feel who, thus, declare that an aim of the traditional behaving morals is not to protect what is fit for human life against vulgar and improper one would be improper. However, theres going to be at least somebody stuck alongside you who wont give a flying about the quality and meaning of the creativity you make.
 
Nature nurture, is a phenomenon, aligned with the power of the two conflicting forces, an idea that was, proposed by Rousseau, in the first place, to establish the fact that we come pure and sinless into the world and it is the company that we are in that defines us, not our inborn gifts. Besides this thing we can just prove that we are looked up not as the incredible savories and cunning folk who can make the only world work which suits what leads the progress.

 The most contrary thing lies in the fact that man could already build a society, but his character was not formed. These were the inevitable consequences of the man's willful misunderstanding of the rules, and the human being's weakness for social norms once they are part of the society.
 
Yet the views of other authors who stressed in a parents’ role in who a child would turn out to be or, as Rousseau called them the human kind and nature state, which remain a mystery to us since it involves the essence or nature of man, and therefore reason is not shown. Standing at the very beginning, Western philosophers - including John Locke - have largely seen the situation the same way as the previous phrase: The management of people has own side of the coin in this regard . It was when the sense of relationship was already developed that you know its safe or risky depending on the interaction put into it.
 
On this consideration the game of power is very much changed with the ultimate decision makers of this issue who are almost the people and the each and every moral argument about anything is useless here as the nature of the harmony of crime already promise success to the servant of guards and harm to the victim, as no one can harm their master. Revolutionizing the soldiers characteristic and the way human evil attitude has taught the soldiers on the battlefield and the endless number of deaths.

It is as comforting as it is disturbing however to consider whether we as a race get into fights or repugnance because of egotism or if it is a fruit of the errors of some men. It is the regrettable defect of humanity that is both peculiar in civilization and common. His main knowledge is directed it the societal function to the human – just a tiny part (the very little share) could bring us the truth of the evil within any person who is much prone to aggression and violence the form of the environment he was in. While the issue at this point of their yoga will go on the way where ultimately they will be able to manage or cope with it, the void is filled with the usage of the peer and support groups.
 

Psychological studies, however, whether they provide a definition of this two-faced nature of a human being or causes one to reflect upon them, are of utmost value on the issue of human morality, and atrocity. Historical facts prove this capacity of humans tenaciously, and our immanent ability to altruism and compassion proves that there is a potential to address issues through good deeds. Although the studies which particularly focus on the genetic nature or the matter of environmental conditions of the people who have the such behavior reflect whether the latter is the main determinant and facilitator of this,the evidence still shows that the situational factors can still result in the violation of moral norms even under the good circumstances.
 
Moreover, structure of the society and rules form together an order which simultaneously dictates people's values, norms, rules, and behavioral principles. For example, it may be possible to examine morality and ethics by comparing Greek and Latin literature that is of the same era with data on cultural norms and religious beliefs that has emerged during that time. After all, this is what society is doing whether it is firing people to direct them to the right moral or cowing people to the counter product orientation of the good or evil course of action.
 
And the other things that are what I call socializing which makes moral development is one more element such as education and socialization. Due to the nature of relations and experiences learned, people imbibe what is considered to be societal values and through these they get a guideline in which to make their behavioral choices, especially on the moral side.
 
Lastly, people’s character has been one of the most intriguing problems–whether inherently good and altruistic, or evil and cruel. Those, who stand for the statement that man is molded by culture and society suppose that people are initially created with the attributes of light and through Fall are naturally gifted with evil, while other supporters holds the opinion that person disposition to both wickedness and goodness is hereditary. By the end it is all about the choice an individual makes on the journey between what is in his nature and what they have been taught to do.

Posted Using InLeo Alpha

Posted Using InLeo Alpha